numbers and evil

In this sentence psychologist James Hillman could be describing neoliberalism …

Working the levers of duty, following the hierarchy of command without imagining anything beyond the narrowness of facts reduced to yet narrower numbers …1

But the sentence finishes like this:

… precisely describes Franz Stangl, who ran the Treblinka death camp, and also describes what Hannah Arendt defines as evil, drawing her paradigmatic example from the failure of intellect and imagination in Adolf Eichmann.

I don’t want to trivialise the holocaust, but Hillman’s writing haunts me not just because of then, but also because of now.

Up next documenting the document Previously I’ve posted links to Windows and MacOS copies of my practice-as-research PhD project Indelible (2005). For people using Intel versions of We Record Ourselves
Latest posts stumbling across down autobiography in five short chapters the pleasure of making things Corporeal Epistemics two people together blog post two people together g the invention of clothing embodied and disembodied emotions are you comfortable there? being heard discarding tribal allegiance Racism and Contemporary Dance algorithms city roads beyond ideas of wrongdoing and rightdoing dance my life away git move slow consent is only meaningful if it is informed just like you the ordinary people terrible sex the long arc end of a dancer stuck on a sentence the worth of an idea on silence and speaking Dance and whiteness challenge our ways