numbers and evil

In this sentence psychologist James Hillman could be describing neoliberalism …

Working the levers of duty, following the hierarchy of command without imagining anything beyond the narrowness of facts reduced to yet narrower numbers …1

But the sentence finishes like this:

… precisely describes Franz Stangl, who ran the Treblinka death camp, and also describes what Hannah Arendt defines as evil, drawing her paradigmatic example from the failure of intellect and imagination in Adolf Eichmann.

I don’t want to trivialise the holocaust, but Hillman’s writing haunts me not just because of then, but also because of now.

Up next documenting the document Previously I’ve posted links to Windows and MacOS copies of my practice-as-research PhD project Indelible (2005). For people using Intel versions of We Record Ourselves
Latest posts the long view naps tendency to want to do something changing minds donato sansone concatenation comfort in confront our errors empty for nothing is fixed eighteen pandemic intimacy one fine day too old to dream sniff the screen to question your knowledge in my body ige consumption small acts of transformation why dance matters now running and avoiding scale memory is like a wikipedia page not standing on your own stumbling across down autobiography in five short chapters the pleasure of making things Corporeal Epistemics two people together blog post two people together g