|||

reliable source

From wired.co.uk/article/wikipedia-fake-news-disinformation:

while other platforms are mired in debate over the borders between free speech, propaganda and trolling, Wikipedia has taken a different route from the onset: community-driven fact checking. One of the platform’s three core policies is verifiability, not truth”, and it requires every claim on Wikipedia be attributed to a reliable source. Any question on the meaning of truth” is deemed moot: either you have a source for your claims, or you don’t. (Wikipedia editors have even debated whether the claim that the sky is blue needs a citation or not.) The resulting debate is much less politicised than the one taking place on social media. Wikipedia’s community standards have created the conditions for a shared reality.

Up next civic responsibility From Roger McNamee’s book Zucked: Waking Up to the Facebook Catastrophe: The internet platforms have harvested fifty years of trust and goodwill the dead What would the dead want from us Watching from their cave? Would they have us forever howling? Would they have us rave Or disfigure ourselves, or be
Latest posts elvis legs grateful love the infinite game and choreography choosing to pay Now: 17 April 2021 the eyes of the other loneliness, uncertainty and boredom better left unsaid 120fps le mani lil making postcards before they love sneaky aspects of group deliberation informational heartbeats what gordon parks saw rhoneisms ideology mean world syndrome dream baby dream and joy xkcd hug count the families if then else nobody the competency model the art of reading question your teaspoons midlifing how to receive updates chasing elvis how a conversation is going to go uncertainty and continuous updating