|||

how to disagree

I don’t know how I happened across this website from 2008 but the opening sentence says so much about how much the web has changed since then:

The web is turning writing into a conversation. Twenty years ago, writers wrote and readers read. The web lets readers respond, and increasingly they do—in comment threads, on forums, and in their own blog posts.

The author — Paul Graham — then outlines what he describes as a disagreement hierarchy:

  1. Name-calling
  2. Ad Hominem
  3. Responding to Tone
  4. Contradiction
  5. Counterargument
  6. Refutation
  7. Refuting the Central Point

paulgraham.com/disagree.html

Paul’s list is such a simple and useful way of thinking about not only the claims we make, but how we listen to others making claims.

Creative commons image from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/When_Doctors_Disagree

Up next midlifing uncertainty and continuous updating Remember that when people announce they “believe science” they are believing in something which has features of uncertainty and continuous updating
Latest posts one of a crowd Force Majeure quality and quantity accents and bravery Force Majeure suzannah Dancing their unhappy freedoms uniqueness and sonder the body in time would have been frame.2 - connecting, moving & making online the arrow emerging experience Editorial: Shifting Dependence gabrielle stand by me cookie monster now: 4 October 2021 Cellule d’Essai 2021: A biography of sorts time management advice probably in a good place what one already knows the show is over belonging is stronger than facts now: 25 July 2021 weakness of the flesh choreography and explaining jokes Editorial: Opposite Sides of Something 2004 and 2021 elvis legs grateful love