|||

the same river twice

In our positivistic civilization, one of the inappropriate compliments sometimes paid to literature is to reduce it to artistic knowledge’. Not that such cognizance does not exist, but art is both more and less than knowledge. It is unique, sui generis, a thing in and of itself. And its experience is one of the precious justifications for our own existence.

While the work of art enriches’ (another unsuitable analogy), at the same time it creates a postpartum sense of loss: the first experience is unique, an act never to be repeated — no matter how great the understanding and appreciation later achieved through the most intent study. If only we could erase from our minds the memory of our favourite books and return to the still unsuspected wonder contained in those works! When we recommend them to our friends, we do so in envy — that we cannot recreate that initial magic for ourselves. And the more we love a book, the greater is our own wistfulness. We cannot step into the same river twice, not so much because the river is different, but because we ourselves are in flux.

– John Glad, Foreward to Varlam Shalamov’s Kolyma Tales

Up next shamefully family man on wire
Latest posts the land in you Attention Adam Phillips on attention Lithium Dancing (in plain sight) urgent time when we party we dance Children of the Soil an image is a call lost types of participation Go in and in Agatha Yu GIFs one of a crowd Force Majeure quality and quantity accents and bravery Force Majeure suzannah Dancing their unhappy freedoms uniqueness and sonder the body in time would have been frame.2 - connecting, moving & making online the arrow emerging experience Editorial: Shifting Dependence gabrielle stand by me cookie monster now: 4 October 2021 Cellule d’Essai 2021: A biography of sorts